Pakistan: Adult by Declaration
In October, Pakistan’s Senate and its Federal Constitutional Court took up the cases of two girls from religious minorities allegedly abducted, converted to Islam and married. Senators heard that the police had held back over a petition two lawyers called fake. Meanwhile, the religious party JUI-F wants the Federal Shariat Court to let puberty, rather than the age of 18, decide who can marry.
Stopped by a petition
On October 19, minority members of the Balochistan Assembly demanded the return of a 14-year-old Hindu girl allegedly abducted in Sibi, taken to Sindh, converted to Islam and married. Under the law the assembly passed last year, a 14-year-old cannot legally marry. The Speaker observed that if she had married in court, her age would need to be examined.
On October 29, the Senate's minority caucus took up what appears to be the same case with senior police officers from Balochistan and Sindh. They explained that no action had been taken because a writ petition had been filed. The president of the High Court Bar called the notice of that petition fake, and a Supreme Court advocate said no petition had been filed and the police had made no serious effort to find the girl. One of the officers asked for seven days. The minister of state for religious affairs pointed to a former lawmaker, expelled by the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) over these very activities.
"Mian Mithu, who is behind all of this, is very powerful."— Kesoo Mal Khael Das, Senate minority caucus, October 29, 2026
No sit-in, no case
In Lasbela, also in Balochistan, a Hindu minor from Mirpurkhas was recovered on October 21 from a Muslim feudal landlord she had allegedly been married to after being abducted and converted, according to the Hindu NGO Pakistan Darawar Ittehad. It has asked the police to register a case and plans a "grand protest sit-in" in December. Its head, Faqir Shiva Kachhi, told HRCP that 36 underage Hindu girls were abducted in 2025 and 32 in the first seven months of 2026, and that activists must stage sit-ins outside police stations "just to get an FIR registered". In Tando Allahyar, it took more than a month and a visit to the station by community leaders to register the abduction of two Hindu sisters aged 13 and 14, who went home on October 19, on the orders of the Sindh High Court.
Eighteen, an un-Islamic number
Islamabad and Balochistan set the minimum age of marriage at 18 in 2025, Punjab in 2026, HRCP notes. The clerics are fighting back. When Parliament passed the Islamabad law, the Council of Islamic Ideology, the constitutional body that advises on Islamic law, ruled that treating marriage under 18 as rape did not conform with Islam.
"Made fornication easier while making legitimate marriages difficult."— Maulana Fazlur Rehman, JUI-F chief, on the Islamabad law, June 1, 2025
In June 2026, his party asked the Federal Shariat Court to declare the law partly repugnant to the Quran and Sunnah. Its petition asks that anyone past puberty, or 15 by default under the Hanafi school, no longer count as a child, and that the court overturn the clause treating cohabitation with a child spouse, within a valid nikah, as "child abuse". The same court ruled in 2023 that a minimum age of 18 was not repugnant to Islam. The JUI-F says it ruled through oversight.
Her word against her records
In Lahore, a Christian girl disappeared on July 29, 2025. Two days later, she told a magistrate she had converted and married of her own free will. NADRA records cited by her family put her at 12. Earlier this year, the Federal Constitutional Court upheld the decision letting the man keep her, finding her of mature age and her NADRA and union council records unreliable, according to HRCP. Her family says a police reinvestigation found the marriage certificate forged.
On October 21, the court heard the family's review petition. Their lawyer invoked the Federal Shariat Court's 2023 ruling, the very one the JUI-F wants overruled. The acting chief justice, Hassan Azhar Rizvi, observed that the girl had "declared herself an adult before the court", that no forum had previously heard any objection to her age and that such disputes belong in family courts. Her birth certificate, the lawyer told the court, was issued ten years late. The hearing was adjourned without a date, as the man could not be served because of an "incomplete residential address".
"We don't know where they are keeping her."— The girl's mother, in a video shown at a UN Human Rights Council side event, Geneva, October 6, 2026
Her birth records were unreliable. The address of the man the court left her with, it turns out, was incomplete.

Comments
No comments yet